Provided examples of risk-based behavior observations Replaced out-of-context note at end of section 7.2Ĭhanged IdP to CSP to match terminology used elsewhere in this documentĬorrected capitalization of Side Channel AttackĬhanged the title to processing limitation clarified the language, incorporated privacy objectives language, and specified that consent is explicitĬlarified wording of verifier impersonation resistance requirementĮmphasized use of key unlocked by additional factor to sign nonce Improve normative language on authenticated protected channels for biometricsĬhanged “transaction” to “binding transaction” to emphasize that requirement doesn’t apply to authentication transactions Recognize use of hardware TPM as hardware crypto authenticator Make language regarding activation factors for multifactor authenticators consistent Refined the requirements about processing of attributes Updated AAL descriptions for consistency with other text in documentĭeleted “cryptographic” to consistently reflect authenticator options at AA元 Errata updates can include corrections, clarifications, or other minor changes in the publication that are either editorial or substantive in nature. This table contains changes that have been incorporated into Special Publication 800-63B. Many NIST cybersecurity publications, other than the ones noted above, are available at. Organizations are encouraged to review all draft publications during public comment periods and provide feedback to NIST. For planning and transition purposes, federal agencies may wish to closely follow the development of these new publications by NIST.
Thus, until each publication is completed, current requirements, guidelines, and procedures, where they exist, remain operative. The information in this publication, including concepts and methodologies, may be used by federal agencies even before the completion of such companion publications. There may be references in this publication to other publications currently under development by NIST in accordance with its assigned statutory responsibilities. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Attribution would, however, be appreciated by NIST.Ĭertain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.
This publication may be used by nongovernmental organizations on a voluntary basis and is not subject to copyright in the United States. Nor should these guidelines be interpreted as altering or superseding the existing authorities of the Secretary of Commerce, Director of the OMB, or any other federal official. Nothing in this publication should be taken to contradict the standards and guidelines made mandatory and binding on federal agencies by the Secretary of Commerce under statutory authority. This guideline is consistent with the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130. NIST is responsible for developing information security standards and guidelines, including minimum requirements for federal systems, but such standards and guidelines shall not apply to national security systems without the express approval of appropriate federal officials exercising policy authority over such systems. This publication has been developed by NIST in accordance with its statutory responsibilities under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) of 2014, 44 U.S.C. Kent Rochford, Acting NIST Director and Under Secretary of Commerce for Standards and National Institute of Standards and Technology
Wrise rise indigp amd sik and tabaco free#
This publication is available free of charge from: National Protection and Programs Directorate NIST Special Publication 800-63B Digital Identity Guidelines Authentication and Lifecycle Management Paul A.
0 kommentar(er)
